Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provider Documentation Removed #343

Open
jland-redhat opened this issue Oct 11, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Provider Documentation Removed #343

jland-redhat opened this issue Oct 11, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
v1.5.0 The changes are planed for version 1.5.0

Comments

@jland-redhat
Copy link

Looking at this commit:

df06e87

Looks like y'all may have accidentally removed the documentation for "Variables for Red Hat Cloud Services Terraform provider"

Very difficult to figure out these different vars like insecure without this docs. I can create a PR to undo this but wanted to make sure this was no by design.

@nirarg
Copy link
Member

nirarg commented Oct 12, 2023

This was removed because those parameters shouldn't be used by external users
As far as I understand from OCM team, only Token should be exposed to external users

Can you please elaborate about your usage case?
What parameters do you use which where removed from the docs?

@arendej FYI

nirarg referenced this issue Oct 12, 2023
* Remove unused attributes
* Remove all attributes but Token from the docs - internal attributes
* Add option for environment variables for all string attributes
* Add "Authentication and configuration" section in the main index and remove attributes section
@jland-redhat
Copy link
Author

We are connecting through a VPN and our network setting is causing a certificate issue so we were getting a 509 error connecting to the Openshift url.

We needed to set the insecure setting to true on the provider in order to use this terraform within the intranet, which is probably something a lot of other enterprises will face as well.

@nirarg
Copy link
Member

nirarg commented Oct 18, 2023

Thank you for the information.
I'm checking the option to have it back in the documentation.
Anyway, you can keep using it, although its not documented

@nirarg nirarg added the v1.5.0 The changes are planed for version 1.5.0 label Oct 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
v1.5.0 The changes are planed for version 1.5.0
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants