You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that you use 15 as the weight for pixel loss, which is much larger than other weights such as for perceptual loss, frequency loss and also generator loss. If such a large coefficient is used, the influence of the discriminator will be reduced and the generator might become a direct estimator approximately. I would like to know if mode collapse can happen when the large weight for pixel loss is used.
BTW, I implemented conditional WGAN for MRI without pixel loss, but the image quality is not good enough.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I noticed that you use 15 as the weight for pixel loss, which is much larger than other weights such as for perceptual loss, frequency loss and also generator loss. If such a large coefficient is used, the influence of the discriminator will be reduced and the generator might become a direct estimator approximately. I would like to know if mode collapse can happen when the large weight for pixel loss is used.
BTW, I implemented conditional WGAN for MRI without pixel loss, but the image quality is not good enough.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: