-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Discussion: What should go into PromptingToolsCore? #145
Comments
Core package (GenerativeBase.jl or something):
PromptingTools.jl:
RAGTools.jl:
AgentTools.jl
|
That all makes sense to me (except maybe for the OpenAI calling being in GenerativeBase, because I could see a lot of stuff creep in with it like user preferences/ENV etc). How about some of the trickier pieces:
As part of the re-structure, it would probably also make sense to separate user preference setting (ENV stuff) from model registry (and maybe make model registry load from a file for easy manipulation / customization). EDIT: I think I would prefer a package names that would be a bit narrower - I feel like “generative” is too broad and these few primitives (which are mostly for LLMs) do not deserve that. |
IMO PromptingTools is a great name! That's basically what you want - tools for working with and submitting prompts to LLMs or other models that take a "prompt". I feel like one of the biggest features for working with LLMs is just having a consistent prompting interface to all kinds of models - and PT already has this! Making it easy to switch between models, and having some basic tools for stuff like
Yes please! |
As discussed previously, we should create a "core" package that defines the many types and interfaces.
What would be the scope of such a package:
render
)pprint
,last_output
)For a given type, let's say AIMessage, what functions should be in the core package?
Any thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: