"Cite special" needs to work as described

[koppor]

A long description of the functionality is given in #13

[subhramit]

@Siedlerchr thoughts on what to do about this? This is not natively supported by the generator functions we have right now (from citeproc), and I forgot to disable the button. Initial thoughts (if we want to add this): Will have to manually parse and forcefully format from the .csl file.

[Siedlerchr]

Out of scope for CSL atm. This refs probably michel-kraemer/citeproc-java#105

[ThiloteE]

Testing this feature can be done with "Modern Language Association 9th Edition"

Current behaviour:

Cite:
✅ This is a test (Tokede et al.).

Cite-in-Text:
✅ (Tokede et al.) It has been shown that this is a test too.

With Cite special (not yet implemented):

❌ According to Tokede and colleagues or Tokede and others, this is yet another test (22).

Sources and more info:

• https://www.scribbr.com/mla/in-text-citations/
• https://www.mla.org/MLA-Style