Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stupid network name ruins the default network on migration #379

Open
Thorinwasher opened this issue Jun 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Stupid network name ruins the default network on migration #379

Thorinwasher opened this issue Jun 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
issue A problem that – while inconvenient – does not impede core functions of the plugin REWRITE This task/issue only applies to the rewritten version of the plugin (currently in ALPHA)

Comments

@Thorinwasher
Copy link

Thorinwasher commented Jun 19, 2024

Bug Description

Migrating when networks of the name <@default@> makes it impossible to use the default network

Reproduction Steps

  • Make a portal in the network <@default@> on a legacy stargate instance
  • Migrate to latest Stargate version
  • Try to create a portal on the default network

Desired Behaviour

The network id <@default@> should be protected during migrations. One possible solution is to simply just make the ID unwritable in legacy by adding a : character

Observed Behaviour

It's nomore possible to create a default network, as that id is used by the custom network <@default@>

Trace Logs

No response

Other Information

No response

@Pheotis Pheotis added issue A problem that – while inconvenient – does not impede core functions of the plugin REWRITE This task/issue only applies to the rewritten version of the plugin (currently in ALPHA) labels Sep 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
issue A problem that – while inconvenient – does not impede core functions of the plugin REWRITE This task/issue only applies to the rewritten version of the plugin (currently in ALPHA)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants