You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I really love the plugins you do and point everyone to them. The one missing thing though is auto-complete on existing vocabs/ontologies/etc. For that we started to bootstrap some code, as we need that in some stuff we do:
rdf-vocabularies-autocomplete: minimal Visual Studio Code extension that shows how auto-completion could work. Includes rdf-vocabularies. Written by my colleague @vhf
I can use our extension with yours but autocomplete is not "smart", in terms of it now tries to expand on pretty much everything. Obviously this would have to be integrated better in the language and it does not make sense to have two packages doing that so our question is if we could work together on that.
I think you have a better understanding on where this would have to be plugged so we would be happy to chat!
Demo of rdf-vocabularies-autocomplete:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The idea would be to enrich the completion items with the actual terms (provided by rdf-vocabularies) of the used vocabularies. Probably here I suppose
Hi, @ktk and @vhf. Thanks for the suggestions and the links (and sorry for taking a little while to respond; we've been busy with other internal projects recently). Our view is that incorporating these vocabularies in some way makes a lot of sense. We'll try to look into the linked repos and see what we can come up with integration-wise very soon.
I really love the plugins you do and point everyone to them. The one missing thing though is auto-complete on existing vocabs/ontologies/etc. For that we started to bootstrap some code, as we need that in some stuff we do:
rdf-vocabularies
. Written by my colleague @vhfI can use our extension with yours but autocomplete is not "smart", in terms of it now tries to expand on pretty much everything. Obviously this would have to be integrated better in the language and it does not make sense to have two packages doing that so our question is if we could work together on that.
I think you have a better understanding on where this would have to be plugged so we would be happy to chat!
Demo of
rdf-vocabularies-autocomplete
:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: