Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support autocomplete for common vocabularies #73

Open
ktk opened this issue May 13, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Support autocomplete for common vocabularies #73

ktk opened this issue May 13, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@ktk
Copy link

ktk commented May 13, 2019

I really love the plugins you do and point everyone to them. The one missing thing though is auto-complete on existing vocabs/ontologies/etc. For that we started to bootstrap some code, as we need that in some stuff we do:

I can use our extension with yours but autocomplete is not "smart", in terms of it now tries to expand on pretty much everything. Obviously this would have to be integrated better in the language and it does not make sense to have two packages doing that so our question is if we could work together on that.

I think you have a better understanding on where this would have to be plugged so we would be happy to chat!

Demo of rdf-vocabularies-autocomplete:

autocomplete

@vhf
Copy link

vhf commented May 20, 2019

The idea would be to enrich the completion items with the actual terms (provided by rdf-vocabularies) of the used vocabularies. Probably here I suppose

@jmrog
Copy link
Contributor

jmrog commented May 21, 2019

Hi, @ktk and @vhf. Thanks for the suggestions and the links (and sorry for taking a little while to respond; we've been busy with other internal projects recently). Our view is that incorporating these vocabularies in some way makes a lot of sense. We'll try to look into the linked repos and see what we can come up with integration-wise very soon.

@ktk
Copy link
Author

ktk commented May 21, 2019

Great thanks @jmrog, let us know if we can help in any way!

@alexkreidler
Copy link

Hey any updates on this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants