You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear ChristophH,
Do you have a tip when we should not proceed with SCTransform. I have several spatial transcriptomics dataset and it has been a few weeks that I am trying to normalize my data through SCTransform. I just figured out that this method does not lead to a correct clustering of the spots while simple normalization works much better after regressing out the ratio of mitochondrial genes. So, I was wondering why SCTransform does not work well for my data while it is a powerful and highly recommended method of normalization.
One more thing is that, I have followed exactly the same workflow and codes in windows and mac and, surprisingly, I received slightly different clusters. How is it possible?
I am just adding my codes which is based on the standard tutorials and I have not added any new things.
I cannot comment on your specific results without actually seeing them and understanding why you think sctransform normalization does not lead "to a correct clustering of the spots".
But I notice that you run FindVariableFeatures after SCTransform. That step is not necessary (and might be a disadvantage) since SCTransform already finds and sets the variable features.
I met the very simmilar problem with you. My dataset have many doublets, and the heterotype doublets formed a long 'bridge' between clusters.
The sctransform pipeline cannot tell 'bridge' from normal clusters, but the seurat intrinstic 'Normalize' worked well.
Dear ChristophH,
Do you have a tip when we should not proceed with SCTransform. I have several spatial transcriptomics dataset and it has been a few weeks that I am trying to normalize my data through SCTransform. I just figured out that this method does not lead to a correct clustering of the spots while simple normalization works much better after regressing out the ratio of mitochondrial genes. So, I was wondering why SCTransform does not work well for my data while it is a powerful and highly recommended method of normalization.
One more thing is that, I have followed exactly the same workflow and codes in windows and mac and, surprisingly, I received slightly different clusters. How is it possible?
I am just adding my codes which is based on the standard tutorials and I have not added any new things.
Thank you very much in advance.
Here is the information from my datasets after pre-processing/filtration:
And here is my sessionInfo:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: