Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

running example using "within xx seconds" #10

Open
yang-cao opened this issue Feb 17, 2016 · 8 comments
Open

running example using "within xx seconds" #10

yang-cao opened this issue Feb 17, 2016 · 8 comments

Comments

@yang-cao
Copy link

When I run simple SQL queries like

Select approx_count(_) from table1 where A = 'xx' _within 0.1 seconds*

I run into an error: Parse Error: mismatched input 'within' expecting EOF near ''table1''

Does blinkdb support clauses like "within xx seconds" as shown in the paper as running examples?

@wangchuan2008888
Copy link

as i digging into source code , only simplewith operator is supported...
This confuse me a lot.

@sunriseLe
Copy link

@yang-cao ,I have also encountered the same problem with you
I use BlinkDB CLI,and run simple SQL queries like:
select count(1) from src within 1 seconds;
I run into an error:
**FAILED: Parse Error: line 1:25 Failed to recognize predicate 'within'. Failed rule: 'kwInner' in join type specifier
**
Have you solved this problem?Thanks.

@wangchuan2008888
Copy link

@sunriseLe I donnot think there has that function. as deep in the source code ,only samplewith operator and approx_sum,approx_avg,approx_count implement.

@yang-cao
Copy link
Author

yang-cao commented May 5, 2017

@sunriseLe Yes, I agree with @wangchuan2008888 I guess such functions may not be supported by BlinkDB (but I didn't look into the code).

@sunriseLe
Copy link

So,why are the statements written in papers?

@sunriseLe
Copy link

I can only run statements such as samplewith operator and approx_sum,approx_avg,approx_count.I want to query with time and error bounds,but I failed! @yang-cao @wangchuan2008888

@qingzma
Copy link

qingzma commented Sep 9, 2018

Yeah, I think only samplewith, approx_sum, approx_avg, and approx_count are implemented. I could not find any more modification in the code.

@pyongjoo
Copy link

FYI, we are actively developing a related open-source AQP system at https://github.com/mozafari/verdictdb

Right now, our engine has the ability to progressively aggregate data (with possibly interactive visual updates), but please file an issue if you have some uses cases for "within XXX seconds".

Disclaimer: I am the main developer of this project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants