-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 123
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
running example using "within xx seconds" #10
Comments
as i digging into source code , only simplewith operator is supported... |
@yang-cao ,I have also encountered the same problem with you |
@sunriseLe I donnot think there has that function. as deep in the source code ,only samplewith operator and approx_sum,approx_avg,approx_count implement. |
@sunriseLe Yes, I agree with @wangchuan2008888 I guess such functions may not be supported by BlinkDB (but I didn't look into the code). |
So,why are the statements written in papers? |
I can only run statements such as samplewith operator and approx_sum,approx_avg,approx_count.I want to query with time and error bounds,but I failed! @yang-cao @wangchuan2008888 |
Yeah, I think only samplewith, approx_sum, approx_avg, and approx_count are implemented. I could not find any more modification in the code. |
FYI, we are actively developing a related open-source AQP system at https://github.com/mozafari/verdictdb Right now, our engine has the ability to progressively aggregate data (with possibly interactive visual updates), but please file an issue if you have some uses cases for "within XXX seconds". Disclaimer: I am the main developer of this project. |
When I run simple SQL queries like
Select approx_count(_) from table1 where A = 'xx' _within 0.1 seconds*
I run into an error: Parse Error: mismatched input 'within' expecting EOF near ''table1''
Does blinkdb support clauses like "within xx seconds" as shown in the paper as running examples?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: