-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bots in the list of contributors #29
Comments
I would be unopposed to tagging them as bots explicitly (e.g., with the |
Robots are people too. (We historically have explicitly kept bots in the list. I would oppose removing them. I would prefer not to tag them, but wouldn't try to block it if people really wanted.) |
If the purpose of the contributors list is to recognize and appreciate people's efforts, then I am in favor of removing the bots from the contributors list. Anthropomorphizing bots is whimsical and can be fun, but people appreciate being recognized while bots do not. It might be fun to count bots separately (maybe a different sort of stats list), but it feels to me like we devalue contributors when we implicitly suggest that a piece of code that we set to a task perpetually deserves more recognition and appreciation than humans putting in their time and effort to develop Rust. It might make sense to include bots in a page that was more stats-oriented, but this page seems more focused on recognizing and appreciating people's efforts than emitting statistical counts of artifacts. |
I'm a hard disagree on that, at least for the bots relevant to this discussion. I have a similar opinion to @CleanCut: in a list designed to celebrate the contributions of humans, it is kinda gross that the #1 spot permanently belongs to a bot. Marking bots clearly (and with a link to an explaining footnote of some kind) would be an improvement. Filtering out bots entirely would be even better, because currently you have to mentally subtract one from everyone's ranking to account for bors. |
There are 6 entries of bots in the list. 4 of them are
dependabot
and the other 2 arebors
. All of them have[bot]
at the end of their names.Maybe we should consider excluding them from the list?
Or, alternatively, we could write their developers' names. But this is controversial, as they're probably developed by a group of people. Also, it's much harder to do from a technical point of view.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: