Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Amazon in-app billing integration #87

Open
christopherperry opened this issue Aug 27, 2012 · 6 comments
Open

Amazon in-app billing integration #87

christopherperry opened this issue Aug 27, 2012 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@christopherperry
Copy link

Any plans on integrating Amazon in-app billing into this library? If anyone wants to work on this, we can fork.

@hpique
Copy link
Member

hpique commented Sep 1, 2012

I'm not sure if if it should be the same library. If you fork and give it a go I'm happy to give it a look.

@christopherperry
Copy link
Author

Ok, I forked and started looking at it last night.

@rubesMN
Copy link

rubesMN commented Dec 12, 2012

I was just evaluating the new Google Version 3 api and none of the improvements compare with the simplicity of the this library and now the Amazon-supporting fork! Now I get simplicity and Amazon.. all in one. Awesome!

@christopherperry
Copy link
Author

Haven't been on this thread for a while. I forked the project and added Amazon integration here: https://github.com/christopherperry/RoboBillingLibrary

@rubesMN
Copy link

rubesMN commented Dec 13, 2012

I'm jazzed! Will start using it this weekend!

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Christopher Perry <
[email protected]> wrote:

Haven't been on this thread for a while. I forked the project and added
Amazon integration here:
https://github.com/christopherperry/RoboBillingLibrary


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/87#issuecomment-11278504.

@AndyScherzinger
Copy link

Any plans on merging this @hpique ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants