Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Always on encryption with SQL Server 2016 #404

Closed
YvesR opened this issue Feb 27, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Always on encryption with SQL Server 2016 #404

YvesR opened this issue Feb 27, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@YvesR
Copy link

YvesR commented Feb 27, 2018

Hello Ken,

I just run into this question:
Does tiny_tds support Always on encryption?

See this link https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/security/encryption/always-encrypted-database-engine.

I did not try, just want to know if pointless to try or give it a try.
Reason is new coming law (EU-DSGVO) which raise the pressure to make encryption by design.

Thanks for info!
Yves

@metaskills
Copy link
Member

Great question. I have no idea but I would assume if they did make this change at the protocol layer, it would be behind some 7.4 flag in TDS similar to active directory #221

Are you able to test this? Also, the FreeTDS list might be a good place to check too since they are the source of all our powers.

@YvesR
Copy link
Author

YvesR commented Feb 27, 2018

OK, I will take care of this and build a test environment and update you as soon I have any results. Or I update this threads if I need help :).

@andyundso
Copy link
Member

I am going to close this issue because of its age.

With #567, we actually have a test scenario that runs with "Always On Encryption", but only on Windows for now. But I would expect that since it works on Windows, it should also work well on Linux.

@andyundso andyundso closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Dec 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants