You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for sharing your code! The normal data are generated from a gaussian distribution with mean as 0 and std as 1 and the sample size is 1000. The anomalous data are generated from a gaussian distribution with mean as 5 and std as 1 and the sample is 20. I tried it with different numbers of max_iter and the results are shown below:
The gradient errors for all cases are all very small (around 1.9e-8), but from the figure you can find totally different patterns of the anomaly scores. For me I feel that num_iter 10 and num_iter 50 provide quite convincing results. But this is a very simple dataset and I can visualize them. Given a multivariate dataset when the data is not easy to visualize and thus evaluate the model performance, is there any other way to do it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello Raghavendra,
Thank you for sharing your code! The normal data are generated from a gaussian distribution with mean as 0 and std as 1 and the sample size is 1000. The anomalous data are generated from a gaussian distribution with mean as 5 and std as 1 and the sample is 20. I tried it with different numbers of max_iter and the results are shown below:
The gradient errors for all cases are all very small (around 1.9e-8), but from the figure you can find totally different patterns of the anomaly scores. For me I feel that num_iter 10 and num_iter 50 provide quite convincing results. But this is a very simple dataset and I can visualize them. Given a multivariate dataset when the data is not easy to visualize and thus evaluate the model performance, is there any other way to do it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: