-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
divj #242
Comments
This function has been switched off, it is not part of gimic any more. We can think about reactivating it. When we removed it nobody complained. It had been removed due to a larger clean up activity of the code. |
I think its useful, but in the end you have to weigh pros and cons of resurrecting it. |
Why is it useful for you? |
I am working on a theoretical description of gauges that lead to divergence-less current contributions.
…________________________________
From: Heike Fliegl <[email protected]>
Sent: 01 May 2019 15:43:26
To: qmcurrents/gimic
Cc: Berger Raphael; Author
Subject: Re: [qmcurrents/gimic] divj (#242)
Why is it useful for you?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#242 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE4IUWEUTF7BYTV6DPK4IT3PTGM75ANCNFSM4HJFNI4A>.
|
Ok, we put it on the to do list. |
great! thank you very much!!
…_________________________________________________
PD Dr. Raphael J. F. Berger, FRSC
Materialchemie
Paris-Lodron Universität Salzburg
Jakob-Harringerstr. 2a
A-5020 Salzburg
ÖSTERREICH
Room: 4OG/07
Tel.: (+)43/ (0)662 8044 6260
____________________________________________________
________________________________
From: Heike Fliegl <[email protected]>
Sent: 01 May 2019 17:20:47
To: qmcurrents/gimic
Cc: Berger Raphael; Author
Subject: Re: [qmcurrents/gimic] divj (#242)
Ok, we put it on the to do list.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#242 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE4IUWBJ32XKO25FO4E6MITPTGYM7ANCNFSM4HJFNI4A>.
|
I assume you are after divJ doing a 3D type calculation? |
yes, all three components are important. it would be good with the read grid option. which iskond of mynew standard method after the base/std grid were disfunctioned.
…________________________________
From: Heike Fliegl <[email protected]>
Sent: 02 May 2019 17:53:31
To: qmcurrents/gimic
Cc: Berger Raphael; Author
Subject: Re: [qmcurrents/gimic] divj (#242)
I assume you are after divJ doing a 3D type calculation?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#242 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE4IUWF4N7L4FTNMSHAWEODPTME7XANCNFSM4HJFNI4A>.
|
I understand. |
Hello all!
I have tried "calc=divj" with various settings for which "calc=cdens" was perfectly working. I always get errors like:
<<< ERROR: gimic(): Unknown operation! >>>
INFO: Deallocated basis set and atom data
Any help would be greatly appreaciated!
Thanks and kind regards
Raphael
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: