Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make _Py_TryIncref public as an unstable API as PyUnstable_Object_TryIncref() #128844

Open
colesbury opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@colesbury
Copy link
Contributor

colesbury commented Jan 14, 2025

Feature or enhancement

We should make _Py_TryIncref public as function with the following signature:

int PyUnstable_Object_TryIncref(PyObject *op);

The function increments the reference count if it's not zero in a thread-safe way. It's logically equivalent to the following snippet and in the default (GIL-enabled) build it's implemented as such:

    if (Py_REFCNT(op) > 0) {
        Py_INCREF(op);
        return 1;
    }
    return 0;

Additionally, we should make _PyObject_SetMaybeWeakref public as PyUnstable_Object_EnableTryIncRef. This function has no equivalent in the GIL-enabled build (it's a no-op), but it's important for making TryIncref work reliably with our biased reference counting implementation.

Motivation

The TryIncref primitive is a building block for handling borrowed and unowned references. It addresses an issue that generally cannot be solved by adding extra synchronization like mutexes because it handles the race between the reference count reaching zero (which is outside developers' control) and the TryIncref.

We use it internally in three subsystems:

  • To implement weak references
  • In asyncio to access the borrowed/unowned list of tasks
  • In the MRO cache, to safely access the borrowed/unowned cached PyObject * entries.

Recently, we discovered a thread safety bug in pybind11 related to the use of borrowed/unowned references. Using _Py_TryIncref in place of Py_INCREF would fix the bug. I think nanobind probably has a similar issue.

Alternatives

  • Use actual weak reference objects instead of borrowed/unowned references. This is cleaner, but is not practical for performance reasons in the above use cases. Using PyWeakRef objects increases the overhead of pybind11 bindings by 30% in some simple tests.
  • Implement something like _Py_TryIncref in extensions. I think this is much worse than making the function public as an unstable API because it requires direct access to the reference count fields -- the implementation is tied to the implementation of biased reference counting -- and I'd like to avoid extensions depending directly on those details.

See also

@corona10
Copy link
Member

cc @encukou @vstinner

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants