You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While triaging your project, our bug fixing tool generated the following message -
In file: routes.py, there is a method that is vulnerable to path manipulation attack. By modifying file paths, an attacker can acquire sensitive information from different resources.
--- certificate_generator/app/routes.py+++ certificate_generator/app/routes.py@@ -48,5 +48,20 @@
if request.method == "GET":
filename = request.args.get("filename")
filepath = os.path.join("static/certificates/generated", filename)
+ '''+ ***************** OpenRefactory Warning *****************+ Possible Path manipulation attack!+ Path:+ File: routes.py, Line: 49+ filename = request.args.get("filename")+ Variable filename is assigned a tainted value from an external source.+ File: routes.py, Line: 50+ filepath = os.path.join("static/certificates/generated", filename)+ Variable filepath is assigned a tainted value.+ File: routes.py, Line: 51+ return send_file(filepath, as_attachment=True, cache_timeout=0,+ attachment_filename=filename)+ Tainted information is used in a sink.+ '''
return send_file(filepath, as_attachment=True, cache_timeout=0,
attachment_filename=filename)
Here filename is taken from request parameters and joined with a specific directory to form a path. Then the file corresponding to that path is sent back as response. Since filename is not sanitized, it can be assinged values containing ../ to cause a path traversal attack.
For example, if current directory is /path/to/app then the following request can be sent to get the contents of /etc/passwd:
The payload is url encoded version of ../../../../../../etc/passwd.
CLA Requirements:
This section is only relevant if your project requires contributors to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) for external contributions.
All contributed commits are already automatically signed off.
The meaning of a signoff depends on the project, but it typically certifies that committer has the rights to submit this work under the same license and agrees to a Developer Certificate of Origin (see https://developercertificate.org/ for more information).
This work is done by the security researchers from OpenRefactory and is supported by the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF): Project Alpha-Omega. Alpha-Omega is a project partnering with open source software project maintainers to systematically find new, as-yet-undiscovered vulnerabilities in open source code - and get them fixed - to improve global software supply chain security.
The bug is found by running the iCR tool by OpenRefactory, Inc. and then manually triaging the results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While triaging your project, our bug fixing tool generated the following message -
In file: routes.py, there is a method that is vulnerable to path manipulation attack. By modifying file paths, an attacker can acquire sensitive information from different resources.
Here
filename
is taken from request parameters and joined with a specific directory to form a path. Then the file corresponding to that path is sent back as response. Sincefilename
is not sanitized, it can be assinged values containing../
to cause a path traversal attack.For example, if current directory is
/path/to/app
then the following request can be sent to get the contents of/etc/passwd
:The payload is url encoded version of
../../../../../../etc/passwd
.CLA Requirements:
This section is only relevant if your project requires contributors to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) for external contributions.
All contributed commits are already automatically signed off.
The meaning of a signoff depends on the project, but it typically certifies that committer has the rights to submit this work under the same license and agrees to a Developer Certificate of Origin (see https://developercertificate.org/ for more information).
Sponsorship and Support:
This work is done by the security researchers from OpenRefactory and is supported by the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF): Project Alpha-Omega. Alpha-Omega is a project partnering with open source software project maintainers to systematically find new, as-yet-undiscovered vulnerabilities in open source code - and get them fixed - to improve global software supply chain security.
The bug is found by running the iCR tool by OpenRefactory, Inc. and then manually triaging the results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: