Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update for TSK>4.7.0 (APFS support)? #59

Closed
ewalkup opened this issue Jun 24, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Update for TSK>4.7.0 (APFS support)? #59

ewalkup opened this issue Jun 24, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@ewalkup
Copy link

ewalkup commented Jun 24, 2020

I'd like to use pytsk to parse APFS filesystems, which TSK added support for in 4.8.0 (they are currently on release 4.9.0).

Any chance of getting an update?

I did try:

  • using python3 setup.py update --use-head
  • changing the tag in setup.py to 4.8.0 or 4.9.0 (and updating) before building

But in both cases, running import pytsk3 afterwards causes Python to segfault.

Using Python 3.6.9 on Ubuntu 18.04.

@ewalkup ewalkup changed the title Update for TSK>4.7.0? Update for TSK>4.7.0 (APFS support)? Jun 24, 2020
@joachimmetz
Copy link
Member

Any chance of getting an update?

Not soon, unless you want to put some effort into this yourself. libtsk 4.8 broke many things (including clang and HFS support), so I definitely not recommend running that version. Not sure if the HFS issues have been addressed in 4.9 since the issue on the github tracker is till open.

However pytsk would also need to be extended with the libtsk "pool system" support to handle APFS, unclear how much work this is.

I'd like to use pytsk to parse APFS filesystems

I recommend using an alternative like pyfsapfs or dfVFS instead

@ewalkup
Copy link
Author

ewalkup commented Jun 25, 2020

Makes sense, sadly. Thanks for the suggestions, I'll look into them.

@joachimmetz joachimmetz self-assigned this Aug 9, 2020
@joachimmetz
Copy link
Member

#64

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants