Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Observability: provide mechanism to get both IP and pod name of blocked traffic #9598

Open
jemag opened this issue Dec 13, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@jemag
Copy link

jemag commented Dec 13, 2024

First of all, let me preface this by saying that I really enjoy Calico. I think it has one of the best/more mature network policy model. We have encouraged others to use it and pushed for Azure to support it more despite their recent stance.

That being said, I do believe that, in the long run, not having this kind of additional observability in the open-source variant might hurt the popularity of Calico.
In our case, we have seen firsthand several other departments opting to go the Cilium route, not because of its policy model or features, but rather simply because of the additional observability provided out of the box.

I think this additional observability would increase the pool of users trying Calico, and by growing this pool, grow the potential conversion to Calico Enterprise/Cloud.

Possible Solution

There are numerous ways to go about this, and obviously Enterprise version should probably maintain superiority of observability.
A potential approach could be:

Simple syslog pod name enrichment
We already have the log action, which can generate syslog of blocked traffic containing the src IP and dst IP. We would simply need to enrich these with pod name, if the IP belongs to a pod within the cluster.

I think this would already be a large improvement for end-users while keeping most of the user friendly/richer features in the Enterprise version.

@caseydavenport
Copy link
Member

@jemag completely agree with you here. Please stay tuned!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants