You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Any new process, pipeline, or toolbox will likely come with its metadata and completion schemas. We must decide, implement and document a way to discover and parse them, and/or to switch to the correct schema when using a pipeline.
This is obviously linked to #268.
For Morphologist we also have an additional complexity: the Morphologist schemas are used both for the Morphologist toolbox (with its own project sources), and for testing Capsul through FakeMorphologist and TinyMorphologist. Implementing the schema in Morphologist would break dependencies and capsul tests (capsul should not depend on Morphologist). So for now it is implemented in Capsul, which is not good, and possibly has side effects (see #327). I don't have a good solution for this right now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Any new process, pipeline, or toolbox will likely come with its metadata and completion schemas. We must decide, implement and document a way to discover and parse them, and/or to switch to the correct schema when using a pipeline.
This is obviously linked to #268.
For Morphologist we also have an additional complexity: the Morphologist schemas are used both for the Morphologist toolbox (with its own project sources), and for testing Capsul through
FakeMorphologist
andTinyMorphologist
. Implementing the schema in Morphologist would break dependencies and capsul tests (capsul should not depend on Morphologist). So for now it is implemented in Capsul, which is not good, and possibly has side effects (see #327). I don't have a good solution for this right now.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: