Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lifting should not duplicate types containing (co)matches #317

Open
timsueberkrueb opened this issue Oct 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Lifting should not duplicate types containing (co)matches #317

timsueberkrueb opened this issue Oct 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@timsueberkrueb
Copy link
Collaborator

Consider the following example:

codata Fun(a b: Type) {
    Fun(a, b).ap(a b: Type, x: a): b
}

codata Forall(p: Type -> Type) {
    Forall(p).forall_ap(p: Type -> Type, x: Type): p.ap(Type, Type, x)
}

let id: Forall(\a. a -> a) {
    comatch { .forall_ap(_, _) => \x.x }
}

When lifting all comatches using cargo run -- lift Forall the_example_above.pol, it generates the following program:

codata Fun(a b: Type) {
    Fun(a, b).ap(a b: Type, x: a): b
}

codata Forall(p: Type -> Type) {
    Forall(p).forall_ap(p: Type -> Type, x: Type): p.ap(Type, Type, x)
}

let id: Forall(\a. a -> a) {MkForall1}

codef MkForall1: Forall(\a. Fun(a, a)) { .forall_ap(x, x0) => \x3. x3 }

In this program, the typechecker compares the type of id with the type of MkForall1. However, since \a. a -> a resp. \a. Fun(a, a) occur in different source code locations, unification is not allowed.

@timsueberkrueb timsueberkrueb added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant