Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pppp does not appear to be working #56

Open
egbulmer opened this issue Mar 2, 2014 · 3 comments
Open

pppp does not appear to be working #56

egbulmer opened this issue Mar 2, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@egbulmer
Copy link

egbulmer commented Mar 2, 2014

So I'm trying to get freex working with Emacs 24. When I run it I get this error: Pymacs helper did not start within 30 seconds and in the *Pymacs* buffer I see:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/home/Elliot/.emacs.d/el-get/pymacs/Pymacs.py", line 40, in <module>
    if PYTHON3:
NameError: name 'PYTHON3' is not defined

Process pymacs exited abnormally with code 1

This seems to be because pppp is not substituting the preprocessor symbols with any value. I tried running make -k prepare but didn't see any suspicious output. Any idea of what is happening?

My setup is: Windows 8, Cygwin Emacs24 & Cygwin Python.

@pinard
Copy link
Owner

pinard commented Mar 2, 2014

On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Elliot Bulmer [email protected]:

if PYTHON3:

NameError: name 'PYTHON3' is not defined

Hi, Elliot. You are sure you installed the .py file, and not the
.py.infile? As you diagnosed that pppp might not be working, I would
guess you
understand how it is meant to work and did not make that error. Sigh!

This seems to be because pppp is not substituting the preprocessor symbols
with any value. I tried running make -k prepare but didn't see any
suspicious output. Any idea of what is happening?

How strange. I did not touch pppp in quite a long time.

Are your starting from a (not too old) GitHub copy? I heard that some
people package Pymacs while being much more interested in pushing for their
packaging tool of the day, than in Pymacs itself, do not much understand
what they do, and goof. I got a few reports from people using some
packaged Pymacs, and so far, the problem always has been in the packaging
or related installation.

My setup is: Windows 8, Cygwin Emacs24 & Python.

Out of despair, you might patch the installed Pymacs.py file and add an
explicit "PYTHON3 = False" (if this is appropriate). pppp was designed so
this should be possible. However, beware @symbol@ substitutions in the
source file, which are not valid Python. I would not think
Pymacs.py.inhas many of those, if any.

Of course, if you get more information about the pppp problem, please tell
me!

François (not fully available however, surgery planned in two days).

François Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca

@egbulmer
Copy link
Author

egbulmer commented Mar 2, 2014

Hi @pinard,

Cheers for your quick reply. I am definitely loading the pymacs.py file produced by the make step. I installed pymacs using el-get. This is the recipe:

(:name pymacs
       :description "Interface between Emacs Lisp and Python"
       :type github
       :pkgname "pinard/Pymacs"
       :prepare
       (progn
         ;; do PYTHONPATH=~/.emacs.d/el-get/pymacs/:$PYTHONPATH
         (el-get-envpath-prepend "PYTHONPATH" default-directory)
         (autoload 'pymacs-load "pymacs" nil t)
         (autoload 'pymacs-eval "pymacs" nil t)
         (autoload 'pymacs-exec "pymacs" nil t)
         (autoload 'pymacs-call "pymacs")
         (autoload 'pymacs-apply "pymacs"))
       :build ("make"))

I'm pretty sure this is fetching pymacs straight from the github repo, setting up some autoloads and running make. The HEAD of the package directory is 352ed4f. I'll try running pppp manually with the -v option and see what output I get.

@egbulmer
Copy link
Author

egbulmer commented Mar 2, 2014

The -v option didn't quite do what I thought it would. But I did try manually defining the variables at the top of pymacs.py as you suggested and that seems to have fixed the problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants