You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The elitism implementation seems a little strange to me. It looks like it's comparing the best in the current generation with the best in the previous generation, the 2nd best in the current generation with the 2nd best in the previous generation, etc. one-by-one. Thus it seems possible that the top candidate from the previous generation is not carried over (not better than the best in the current generation) but the second best candidate from the previous is carried over (better than the 2nd best in the current generation). But, I might also be reading the code incorrectly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The elitism implementation seems a little strange to me. It looks like it's comparing the best in the current generation with the best in the previous generation, the 2nd best in the current generation with the 2nd best in the previous generation, etc. one-by-one. Thus it seems possible that the top candidate from the previous generation is not carried over (not better than the best in the current generation) but the second best candidate from the previous is carried over (better than the 2nd best in the current generation). But, I might also be reading the code incorrectly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: