Replies: 10 comments
-
The Qt in proper version is shipped together with SQLiteStudio in the same package. It should be using this one. Can you please tell me results of these 2 commands (while being in directory
and then also:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I had to rename all the libs in the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Still, it should not even need to do this... Did you use binary package from sqlitestudio.pl? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes, Linux files (64bit) sqlitestudio-3.2.1.tar.xz (portable) from Releases page. In addition, the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Can you please also tell me what this command shows you: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That's the problem. There should be symlinks, like this: What did you use to decompress the tar.xz package? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ubuntu's built-in Archive manager, just unpacked the archive contents to my /home folder |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I've tried that and it works correctly. I'm not sure what went wrong for you, but definitely you ended up with incorrectly decompressed package. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That is weird. I just did that again and there are symlinks in lib, but the original one doesn't have them. I haven't even gone into the libs folder until I read this issue here... All I got from running
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello,
I just tried to run the portable version of sqlitestudio 3.2.1 in my Ubuntu 18.04, and I get the following message:
./sqlitestudio: /home/mysef/bin/SQLiteStudio/lib/libQt5Core.so.5: version `Qt_5.10' not found (required by ./sqlitestudio)
Looks like sqlitestudiopl 3.2.1 is compiled against a vary recent version of QT. Ubuntu 18.04 just released just 3 monts ago, and I hate the idea of manually installing another version of QT.
I imagine other users are experiencing the same? Or is it me?
Would it be possible to have a new package compiled using a more commonly available version of QT?
Thank you,
mario
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions