Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bashlib missing license #1

Open
Denperidge opened this issue Jul 5, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Bashlib missing license #1

Denperidge opened this issue Jul 5, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation out of scope Non-marshmellow: nice to haves, but only if every other issue has been fixed

Comments

@Denperidge
Copy link
Contributor

More details here: SolidLabResearch/Bashlib#13
Since our project leader referred us to bashlib, I assume it should be okay for us to use it. I'll follow the issue I've created and adapt our documentation (or worst case scenario, script usage) accordingly!

@Denperidge Denperidge added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jul 5, 2022
@Denperidge Denperidge self-assigned this Jul 5, 2022
@Denperidge Denperidge added the out of scope Non-marshmellow: nice to haves, but only if every other issue has been fixed label Jul 20, 2022
@Denperidge
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added out of scope, but its more out of our control

@DemianD
Copy link
Member

DemianD commented Jul 27, 2022

Found the following two licenses:

It's licensed under ISC

@Denperidge Denperidge removed their assignment Jul 27, 2022
@Denperidge
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh great find! But I'm afraid its the default option when generating the package.json sadly. Either way, they have no license we can properly link to 😥

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation out of scope Non-marshmellow: nice to haves, but only if every other issue has been fixed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants