Should multiple delegates be allowed?

[arik-so]

Should inscriptions be allowed to have multiple, or fallback, delegates?

Currently, the way an inscription with a delegate renders is it simply returns the content and effective mime type of the delegate it references. Multiple delegates would allow a fallback mechanism that would lend itself particularly well to multi-phase gradual revelations.

Is it worth it? Is it preferable to some sort of dynamic inscription mechanism using recursion? I don't know, but it seems like an easy enough change – unlike recursive delegates, whose implementation I foresee being a horrible headache.

If there's any interest, I already have a PR up, where @casey prompted this discussion.

[casey]

I'm thinking this is probably fine to add. I can't think of a super principled reason not to.

[raphjaph]

LFG