Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

using MARC relators as roles #13

Open
vioil opened this issue Nov 6, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

using MARC relators as roles #13

vioil opened this issue Nov 6, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@vioil
Copy link
Member

vioil commented Nov 6, 2015

This idea has been floating between me and Melissa and few other folks for a while. For those not familiar with MARC relators please have a look here: http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators.html

Let's look at one of the examples - the MARC presenter role: http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/pre.html

and see if we can we utilize it like in the image bellow. In this scenario the Presenter replaces the Attribution from the diagram Melissa had (we need to upload that one here as well). In this scenario I believe that under violeta, which is Agent, we can use any URI, including the VIVO URI. Thoughts?

contributionvioleta-copy

@mellybelly
Copy link

This seemed very consistent with our modeling, we wanted everyone's feedback. @vioil would MARC work with us if we needed changes?

@vioil
Copy link
Member Author

vioil commented Nov 7, 2015

I'll get in touch with relevant stakeolders.

@mjaved495
Copy link
Member

I am very much interested in learning about it. But, I am not clear about the planned modeling. I will take example of “Presenter”. http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/pre.html

If I have read the figure correct,
Presenter is shown as a Resource (perhaps owl:Individual) and Presenter is linked to a role (PresenterRole) through property “role”.

If I look at loc page for Presenter (link given above), it is mentioned that “Presenter”

Instance of:

  • OWL ObjectPropertyhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty [Offsite link]

Sub-Property Of:

A little confused here.

Javed

Muhammad Javed, Ph.D.
Ontology Engineer/ Semantic Application Developer

ITS Department
Albert R. Mann Library
237 Mann Drive
Ithaca, NY 14853
USA
http://vivo.cornell.edu/individual/mj495

From: Violeta Ilik <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]>
Reply-To: vivo-isf/vivo-isf-dev <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]>
Date: Friday, November 6, 2015 at 6:47 PM
To: vivo-isf/vivo-isf-dev <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [vivo-isf-dev] using MARC relators as roles (#13)

This idea has been floating between me and Melissa and few other folks for a while. For those not familiar with MARC relators please have a look here: http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators.html

Let's look at one of the examples - the MARC presenter role: http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/pre.html

and see if we can we utilize it like in the image bellow. In this scenario the Presenter replaces the Attribution from the diagram Melissa had (we need to upload that one here as well). In this scenario I believe that under violeta, which is Agent, we can use any URI, including the VIVO URI. Thoughts?

[contributionvioleta-copy]https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3239996/11011003/69ab3730-84a9-11e5-84e0-d0acc2407315.jpeg


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/13.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants