-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: skip block indexing if it raises an error while loading #35139
fix: skip block indexing if it raises an error while loading #35139
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, @rpenido! What's next?Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review: 🔘 Get product approvalIf you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.
🔘 Provide contextTo help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:
🔘 Get a green buildIf one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green. 🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:Who will review my changes?This repository is currently maintained by Where can I find more information?If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:
When can I expect my changes to be merged?Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible. However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:
💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR. |
6f0680e
to
e41db7f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rpenido Thank you for finding this issue and fixing it!
I've proposed a slightly different implementation -- please let me know what do you think.
Could you also add a brief test to openedx/core/djangoapps/content/search/tests/test_api.py
which demonstrates the issue, so we're sure it stays fixed?
Co-authored-by: Jillian <[email protected]>
Tests here: a5fa737 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Thanks @rpenido !
- I tested this by running
./manage.py cms reindex_studio --experimental
on a course containing an ORA problem. Noted indexing the ORA was skipped, but the rest of the library was indexed as expected. - I read through the code
-
I checked for accessibility issuesN/A -
Includes documentationN/A -
User-facing strings are extracted for translationN/A
@rpenido 🎉 Your pull request was merged! Please take a moment to answer a two question survey so we can improve your experience in the future. |
2U Release Notice: This PR has been deployed to the edX staging environment in preparation for a release to production. |
2U Release Notice: This PR has been deployed to the edX production environment. |
1 similar comment
2U Release Notice: This PR has been deployed to the edX production environment. |
Description
This PR handles errors while updating the document for a library component, so if we get an error with one component, it does not prevent other components from the library from being indexed.
More info
While indexing a library with an
openassessment
block, the following error is thrown:Every assessment must contain a "title" element.
This prevented the whole library with anopenassessment
block from being indexed.