-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Poor contrast between 'added block' background and comments in comparison view #103
Comments
Hi @ratskinmahoney 👋, thanks for your contribution 👍
I'll also test the diff view next time I push a PR. If this style is still used in the latest version, I think I'll port the improved styles implemented for the VS Code theme. |
Thanks for the prompt and detailed reply, @arcticicestudio. The version of the plugin I'm using is 0.8.1 - apologies for missing this information out in the initial report: I've followed the instructions in the comment you linked above:
The colours still look the same, I'm afraid: Here is what they look like normally: PS: I'd be happy with the VS Code theme colours suggested. Cheers! |
I am still seeing this issue as well with 11.2 |
This is still a pending topic one a large list, but everyone can feel free to submit a PR using the linked PR from the VS Code port as reference. Unfortunately the proposal microsoft/vscode#71663 was closed/not accepted to improve the theme API within VS Code itself so I guess there's no other way around than adapting the adjusted styles from Nord Visual Studio Code. |
Thanks for the update, @arcticicestudio. Edit: Opened a PR and moved the comment to there: #159 |
When using the comparison view, the contrast between the 'added block' background colour and the comment colour makes reading the comments difficult (or at least, uncomfortable). This particular background colour makes reading anything at least a little uncomfortable, and I tend to select-all in order to avoid it, but I find it most difficult with comments.
Comments:
General:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: