You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In 'An Evaluation and Comparison of Linguistic Alignment Measures', Xu and Reitter (2015) evaluate Spearman's correlation coefficient, LLA, and RepDecay. They report LLA has the best performance with respect to normality and sensitivity, and 'yields more significant between-individual differences and has better within-individual stability'. It would be interesting to repeat the experiments with cosine similarity, and see how it compares to LLA. If the two exhibit complementary advantages, it may be interesting to incorporate an LLA implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In 'An Evaluation and Comparison of Linguistic Alignment Measures', Xu and Reitter (2015) evaluate Spearman's correlation coefficient, LLA, and RepDecay. They report LLA has the best performance with respect to normality and sensitivity, and 'yields more significant between-individual differences and has better within-individual stability'. It would be interesting to repeat the experiments with cosine similarity, and see how it compares to LLA. If the two exhibit complementary advantages, it may be interesting to incorporate an LLA implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: