You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hope your postdoctoral position in Singapore is great! Remember I emailed you a few months ago!
Listen, I've been studying your package since past january now, and seems to me like there is no reliable/robust way to handle gradient artefacts with NK... So I reviewed the literature about ECG signal processing and found how I could qualify and correct for false detection with mean-square error minimization. Thanks to Pekkanen's segmenter, I could come up with something not so terrible.
Hi @DominiqueMakowski ,
Hope your postdoctoral position in Singapore is great! Remember I emailed you a few months ago!
Listen, I've been studying your package since past january now, and seems to me like there is no reliable/robust way to handle gradient artefacts with NK... So I reviewed the literature about ECG signal processing and found how I could qualify and correct for false detection with mean-square error minimization. Thanks to Pekkanen's segmenter, I could come up with something not so terrible.
Anyways, I was wondering if you had any knowledge of higher-order statistics filter design such as this one : https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bmte.2018.63.issue-4/bmt-2016-0232/bmt-2016-0232.xml ... or, Really, any other way to analyse my noisy signals.
I'd be willing to explore this and try to implement this 4th order central-moment filter! I'm currently waiting for one of the author's response.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: