Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About providers and other dependencies #4

Closed
muniter opened this issue Feb 7, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

About providers and other dependencies #4

muniter opened this issue Feb 7, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@muniter
Copy link
Member

muniter commented Feb 7, 2022

Excited to see the spec :)

Perhaps the spec will benefit by also specifying other type of dependencies:

  1. Neovim providers: provider-python, provider-node, etc. This could allow future integration with the healthcheck module.

  2. External programs: ripgrep, find, etc. Could also be integrated with the healthcheck module could check for installation by checking for certain executable names, checking version would be perhaps too complex.

Point 1 seems straightforward to do, point 2 is more complex and out of the control of neovim development, still wanted to put the idea out there.

  1. The field description.author could be a nice addition, I can imagine filtering packages by tpope, etc.
@wbthomason
Copy link
Contributor

External/system dependencies was brought up by @mjlbach and @lewis6991 and seems like a good thing to add.

@mjlbach
Copy link
Contributor

mjlbach commented Feb 13, 2022

Do you want to split these into separate issues? I think 2 is already covered by #13, I'm not quite sure about 1, maybe an additional key under dependencies providers? (cc @ii14). I think 3 is a straightforward addition and could be PR'd (maybe a table with email? name?)

@mjlbach
Copy link
Contributor

mjlbach commented Mar 29, 2022

With authors being added, and #13 for 2, I think the only thing left is 1. Do you want to make a new issue for that?

@mjlbach mjlbach closed this as completed Mar 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants