Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposed quality control workflow #9

Closed
niekdejonge opened this issue Oct 18, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Proposed quality control workflow #9

niekdejonge opened this issue Oct 18, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@niekdejonge
Copy link
Collaborator

niekdejonge commented Oct 18, 2023

The workflow for quality control of library spectra I have in mind would look something like this:

Complete annotation:

  • Harmonize metadata fields.
  • Correct wrongly entered fields. e.g. adduct is often added after the compound name.
  • Derive missing fields from other fields. E.g parent mass from adduct + precursor mz or charge from adduct. Or smiles from compound name (search on pubchem)

Check if metadata is correct:

Automatically suggest corrections for common mistakes:

  • Suggest adduct replacement, based on precursor mz and parent mass.
  • Remove ions from salts.

The user should get a clear overview of the changed fields. The completions can probably just be highlighted with colour, while the automatic corrections should get a confirmation by the user.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant