Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Security Checklist #398

Open
35 of 43 tasks
jvehent opened this issue Nov 29, 2018 · 13 comments
Open
35 of 43 tasks

Security Checklist #398

jvehent opened this issue Nov 29, 2018 · 13 comments

Comments

@jvehent
Copy link

jvehent commented Nov 29, 2018

Risk Management

  • The service must have performed a Rapid Risk Assessment and have a Risk Record bug
  • The service must be registered via a New Service issue

Infrastructure

  • Access and application logs must be archived for a minimum of 90 days
  • Use Modern or Intermediate TLS
  • Set HSTS to 31536000 (1 year)
    • strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000
    • If the service is not hosted under services.mozilla.com, it must be manually added to Firefox's preloaded pins. This only applies to production services, not short-lived experiments.
  • If service has an admin panels, it must:
    • only be available behind Mozilla VPN (which provides MFA)
    • require Auth0 authentication

Development

  • Ensure your code repository is configured and located appropriately:
    • Application built internally should be hosted in trusted GitHub organizations (mozilla, mozilla-services, mozilla-bteam, mozilla-conduit, mozilla-mobile, taskcluster). Sometimes we build and deploy applications we don't fully control. In those cases, the Dockerfile that builds the application container should be hosted in its own repository in a trusted organization.
    • Secure your repository by implementing Mozilla's GitHub security standard.
  • Sign all release tags, and ideally commits as well
    • Developers should configure git to sign all tags and upload their PGP fingerprint to https://login.mozilla.com
    • The signature verification will eventually become a requirement to shipping a release to staging & prod: the tag being deployed in the pipeline must have a matching tag in git signed by a project owner. This control is designed to reduce the risk of a 3rd party GitHub integration from compromising our source code.
  • enable security scanning of 3rd-party libraries and dependencies
    • For node.js, use npm audit with audit-filter to review and handle exceptions (see example in speech-proxy)
    • For Python, enable pyup security updates:
      • Add a pyup config to your repo (example config: https://github.com/mozilla-services/antenna/blob/master/.pyup.yml)
      • Enable branch protection for master and other development branches. Make sure the approved-mozilla-pyup-configuration team CANNOT push to those branches.
      • From the "add a team" dropdown for your repo /settings page
        • Add the "Approved Mozilla PyUp Configuration" team for your github org (e.g. for mozilla and mozilla-services)
        • Grant it write permission so it can make pull requests
      • notify [email protected] to enable the integration in pyup
  • Keep 3rd-party libraries up to date (in addition to the security updates)
  • Integrate static code analysis in CI, and avoid merging code with issues
    • Javascript applications should use ESLint with the Mozilla ruleset
    • Python applications should use Bandit
    • Go applications should use the Go Meta Linter
    • Use whitelisting mechanisms in these tools to deal with false positives

Dual Sign Off

  • Services that push data to Firefox clients must require a dual sign off on every change, implemented in their admin panels
    • This mechanism must be reviewed and approved by the Firefox Operations Security team before being enabled in production

Logging

  • Publish detailed logs in mozlog format (APP-MOZLOG)
    • Business logic must be logged with app specific codes (see FxA)
    • Access control failures must be logged at WARN level

Web Applications

  • Must have a CSP with
    • a report-uri pointing to the service's own /__cspreport__ endpoint
    • web API responses should return default-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'none'; report-uri /__cspreport__ to disallowing all content rendering, framing, and report violations
    • if default-src is not none, frame-src, and object-src should be none or only allow specific origins
    • no use of unsafe-inline or unsafe-eval in script-src, style-src, and img-src
  • Third-party javascript must be pinned to specific versions using Subresource Integrity (SRI)
  • Web APIs must set a non-HTML content-type on all responses, including 300s, 400s and 500s
  • Set the Secure and HTTPOnly flags on Cookies, and use sensible Expiration
  • Make sure your application gets an A+ on the Mozilla Observatory
  • Verify your application doesn't have any failures on the Security Baseline.
    • Contact secops@ or ping 'psiinon' on github to document exceptions to the baseline, mark csrf exempt forms, etc.
  • Web APIs should export an OpenAPI (Swagger) to facilitate automated vulnerability tests

Security Features

  • Authentication of end-users should be via FxA. Authentication of Mozillians should be via Auth0/SSO. Any exceptions must be approved by the security team.
  • Session Management should be via existing and well regarded frameworks. In all cases you should contact the security team for a design and implementation review
    • Store session keys server side (typically in a db) so that they can be revoked immediately.
    • Session keys must be changed on login to prevent session fixation attacks.
    • Session cookies must have HttpOnly and Secure flags set and the SameSite attribute set to 'strict' or 'lax' (which allows external regular links to login).
    • For more information about potential pitfalls see the OWASP Session Management Cheat Sheet
  • Form that change state should use anti CSRF tokens. Anti CSRF tokens can be dropped for internal sites using SameSite session cookies where we are sure all users will be on Firefox 60+. Forms that do not change state (e.g. search forms) should use the 'data-no-csrf' form attribute.
  • Access Control should be via existing and well regarded frameworks. If you really do need to roll your own then contact the security team for a design and implementation review.
  • If you are building a core Firefox service, consider adding it to the list of restricted domains in the preference extensions.webextensions.restrictedDomains. This will prevent a malicious extension from being able to steal sensitive information from it, see bug 1415644.

Databases

  • All SQL queries must be parameterized, not concatenated
  • Applications must use accounts with limited GRANTS when connecting to databases
    • In particular, applications must not use admin or owner accounts, to decrease the impact of a sql injection vulnerability.

Common issues

  • User data must be escaped for the right context prior to reflecting it
    • When inserting user generated html into an html context:
      • Python applications should use Bleach
      • Javascript applications should use DOMPurify
  • Apply sensible limits to user inputs, see input validation
    • POST body size should be small (<500kB) unless explicitly needed
  • When allowing users to upload or generate content, make sure to host that content on a separate domain (eg. firefoxusercontent.com, etc.). This will prevent malicious content from having access to storage and cookies from the origin.
    • Also use this technique to host rich content you can't protect with a CSP, such as metrics reports, wiki pages, etc.
  • When managing permissions, make sure access controls are enforced server-side
  • If an authenticated user accesses protected resource, make sure the pages with those resource arent cached and served up to unauthenticated users (like via a CDN).
  • If handling cryptographic keys, must have a mechanism to handle quarterly key rotations
    • Keys used to sign sessions don't need a rotation mechanism if destroying all sessions is acceptable in case of emergency.
  • Do not proxy requests from users without strong limitations and filtering (see Pocket UserData vulnerability). Don't proxy requests to link local, loopback, or private networks or DNS that resolves to addresses in those ranges (i.e. 169.254.0.0/16, 127.0.0.0/8, 10.0.0.0/8, 100.64.0.0/10, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16, 198.18.0.0/15).
  • Do not use target="_blank" in external links unless you also use rel="noopener noreferrer" (to prevent Reverse Tabnabbing)
@jvehent
Copy link
Author

jvehent commented Nov 29, 2018

@jvehent
Copy link
Author

jvehent commented Nov 29, 2018

@peterbe
Copy link
Contributor

peterbe commented Dec 18, 2018

@jvehent @g-k We're almost done doing the last couple of security things. e.g. A+ on Observatory.

What do we need to do to get buildhub.moz.tools (and stage??) to the Security Baseline?

@g-k
Copy link

g-k commented Dec 18, 2018

@peterbe Nice! Can you file a new service issue or point us to it the existing one? Then I can add that metadata to the zap baseline config.

@psiinon
Copy link

psiinon commented Dec 18, 2018

@peterbe looks like those sites are failing the baseline on:

  • Content Security Policy (CSP) Header Not Set
  • Strict-Transport-Security Header Not Set
    • Looks like these are just on 404s
  • X-Content-Type-Options Header Missing

Is that enough info? If not just let me know what you need.

@peterbe
Copy link
Contributor

peterbe commented Dec 18, 2018

@psiinon I suspect what you're referring to is the production site (buildhub.moz.tools). We made some changes to the Stage first which should plug those missing holes. In particular, we made sure that Django also sets a bunch of good security headers so we don't have to exclusively rely on Nginx to get these things right.

@peterbe
Copy link
Contributor

peterbe commented Dec 18, 2018

Stage is A+ at least

@psiinon
Copy link

psiinon commented Dec 19, 2018

Yeah, stage is looking good now, its passing both the Observatory and Baseline checks with flying colours :D

@peterbe
Copy link
Contributor

peterbe commented Jan 10, 2019

@g-k

Can you file a new service issue or point us to it the existing one? Then I can add that metadata to the zap baseline config.

@autrilla already did: https://github.com/mozilla-services/foxsec/issues/1136

@peterbe
Copy link
Contributor

peterbe commented Jan 10, 2019

screen shot 2019-01-10 at 2 20 17 pm

@peterbe
Copy link
Contributor

peterbe commented Jan 10, 2019

@psiinon Can you check...

[ ] Verify your application doesn't have any failures on the Security Baseline.

@psiinon
Copy link

psiinon commented Jan 14, 2019

@peterbe yes, it passes the Security Baseline :)

@peterbe
Copy link
Contributor

peterbe commented Jan 31, 2019

The only thing missing hardening the Elasticsearch API which we're proxying. I forked it into this issue: #471

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants