Reconsidering the priority of bitwise operator and comparative operator

[KCN-judu]

operator & does not have a higher priority than operator ==
e.g.

fn is_odd(n: Int){
  n & 1 == 1
}

this will raise a "expr type mismatch".

but it works like this
e.g.

fn is_odd(n: Int){
  (n & 1) == 1
}

[Lampese]

But isn't it right?

[peter-jerry-ye]

We may not want to follow the priority of other languages, especially C which doesn't have native boolean cc @Yoorkin