UMI with Nanopore Data #1615
-
Hello, I had a quite disparity in number of clonotypes assembled before and after accounting for read UMIs. I was wondering what might be the reason behind this phenomenon. This is the assemble report when executed without read UMI consideration. Analysis time: 21.1s This is the assemble report when I considered a 12 bp UMI at the 5' end. Analysis time: 12m |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi, so the report looks fine, and most likely the results you get are accurate. UMIs help to reduce artificial diversity by correcting the errors, so it is only logical that you see a lower number of clones. My guess is the top clonotypes are the same, and the ones that were correct are the singletons. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi, so the report looks fine, and most likely the results you get are accurate. UMIs help to reduce artificial diversity by correcting the errors, so it is only logical that you see a lower number of clones. My guess is the top clonotypes are the same, and the ones that were correct are the singletons.