Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] How to directly define a model that includes a qgemm node? #22743

Open
R-Ceph opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
feature request request for unsupported feature or enhancement

Comments

@R-Ceph
Copy link

R-Ceph commented Nov 6, 2024

Describe the feature request

In this issue (#19503), we found that sometimes it's not possible to directly convert gemm to qgemm.

Moreover, on this page (https://onnx.ai/onnx/operators/onnx__MatMulInteger.html) I found that QGemm is a custom operator of onnxruntime, which means it's also not possible to directly create a QGemm node using onnx.helper.make_node.

Therefore, I would like to consult on how to directly define a model that includes a qgemm node, rather than obtaining it through conversion?

Describe scenario use case

Sometimes it's not possible to directly convert gemm to QGemm, and I want to try QGemm instead of QLinearMatMul.

@R-Ceph R-Ceph added the feature request request for unsupported feature or enhancement label Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request request for unsupported feature or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant