You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In this issue (#19503), we found that sometimes it's not possible to directly convert gemm to qgemm.
Moreover, on this page (https://onnx.ai/onnx/operators/onnx__MatMulInteger.html) I found that QGemm is a custom operator of onnxruntime, which means it's also not possible to directly create a QGemm node using onnx.helper.make_node.
Therefore, I would like to consult on how to directly define a model that includes a qgemm node, rather than obtaining it through conversion?
Describe scenario use case
Sometimes it's not possible to directly convert gemm to QGemm, and I want to try QGemm instead of QLinearMatMul.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the feature request
In this issue (#19503), we found that sometimes it's not possible to directly convert gemm to qgemm.
Moreover, on this page (https://onnx.ai/onnx/operators/onnx__MatMulInteger.html) I found that QGemm is a custom operator of onnxruntime, which means it's also not possible to directly create a QGemm node using onnx.helper.make_node.
Therefore, I would like to consult on how to directly define a model that includes a qgemm node, rather than obtaining it through conversion?
Describe scenario use case
Sometimes it's not possible to directly convert gemm to QGemm, and I want to try QGemm instead of QLinearMatMul.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: