You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have a huge legacy IDL library where most objects have been written with "get" and "set" as accessors and mutators. To stay consistent with that notation, it would be very helpful if class::get and class::set would be treated like class::GetProperty and class::SetProperty, i.e. have IDLdoc create a properties section.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have a huge legacy IDL library where most objects have been written with "get" and "set" as accessors and mutators. To stay consistent with that notation, it would be very helpful if class::get and class::set would be treated like class::GetProperty and class::SetProperty, i.e. have IDLdoc create a properties section.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: