You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A missing (sensor, level) pair in the Obsinn message format is treated differently by Kvalobs and LARD.
Obsinn param code
Kvalobs Sensor Level
LARD Sensor Level
TA
('0', 0)
(NULL, NULL)
TA(0,0)
('0', 0)
(0, 0)
While migrating from Kvalobs, it's impossible to tell the difference between the two cases, unless the timeseries is already present in LARD. And after the migration, we might end up with timeseries data split between two labels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Will it help to have a tool that dedupes cases of suspected duplication? That is, if similar timeseries are checked to be fully identical, then the "least preferred" one will be removed and archived?
A missing (sensor, level) pair in the Obsinn message format is treated differently by Kvalobs and LARD.
('0', 0)
(NULL, NULL)
('0', 0)
(0, 0)
While migrating from Kvalobs, it's impossible to tell the difference between the two cases, unless the timeseries is already present in LARD. And after the migration, we might end up with timeseries data split between two labels.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: