You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I recently upgraded from 0.13.0 to 0.14.2 and a job that uses xmltodict went from using about 2.5 GB to about 29 GB of memory. I was able to narrow the difference down to changes between 0.13.0 and 0.14.0.
Here are plots of the memory usage for the exact same code using the two different versions. (Plots created using memory-profiler==0.61.0)
The file that is being parsed is an 8.8 GB xml.
I am unable to include all of the surrounding code or the raw xml, but I will show the call that I make to xmltodict.parse(...) below:
I recently upgraded from
0.13.0
to0.14.2
and a job that usesxmltodict
went from using about 2.5 GB to about 29 GB of memory. I was able to narrow the difference down to changes between0.13.0
and0.14.0
.Here are plots of the memory usage for the exact same code using the two different versions. (Plots created using
memory-profiler==0.61.0
)The file that is being parsed is an 8.8 GB xml.
I am unable to include all of the surrounding code or the raw xml, but I will show the call that I make to
xmltodict.parse(...)
below:If this is not enough to go on then please let me know and I will try to produce a simple example with anonymized data.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: