You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Neutrals currently have support for 3V velocity space with the vzvrvzeta coordinates. This choice seems natural when using cylindrical coordinates, but with require interpolation when mapping from the charged particle vpavperpgyrophase coordinates. There are currently no differential velocity space operators envisaged for the neutral pdf. This means that we could avoid costly 3V interpolation by using vpavperpgyrophase coordinates for the neutral velocity space.
This change would require refactoring some loops, the mpi, and require some functions for mapping vpavperpgyrophase to vzvrvzeta for the advection routines.
@johnomotani@LucasMontoya4 Do moment-kinetic neutrals already have "acceleration" terms with velocity derivatives on the neutral pdf? (because of the change of variables).
Neutrals currently have support for 3V velocity space with the
vz
vr
vzeta
coordinates. This choice seems natural when using cylindrical coordinates, but with require interpolation when mapping from the charged particlevpa
vperp
gyrophase
coordinates. There are currently no differential velocity space operators envisaged for the neutral pdf. This means that we could avoid costly 3V interpolation by usingvpa
vperp
gyrophase
coordinates for the neutral velocity space.This change would require refactoring some loops, the mpi, and require some functions for mapping
vpa
vperp
gyrophase
tovz
vr
vzeta
for the advection routines.@johnomotani @mabarnes @LucasMontoya4 Would this rewrite be of interest for (or before) the generalisation from 1D1V to 1D2V moment kinetics?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: