Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support deploying measurement-lab only views #85

Open
stephen-soltesz opened this issue Aug 17, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Support deploying measurement-lab only views #85

stephen-soltesz opened this issue Aug 17, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@stephen-soltesz
Copy link
Contributor

measurement-lab only has views to production tables managed by mlab-oti.

Up to this point, the "canonical" locations for tables did not intersect with real tables in all projects. This was because real tables were in "base_tables" dataset, and we wanted canonical views in the experiment named dataset, e.g. "ndt".

Now the universal gardener creates and writes to tables in the "raw_ndt" dataset for sandbox, staging, and oti. However, we need only views in measurement-lab. The current deployment process does not yet support this.

@autolabel autolabel bot added the review/triage Team should review and assign priority label Aug 17, 2020
@stephen-soltesz
Copy link
Contributor Author

When manually creating the views, I did not update the "authorized views" for the mlab-oti.raw_ndt dataset #86

@laiyi-ohlsen laiyi-ohlsen added P1 and removed review/triage Team should review and assign priority labels Sep 28, 2020
@mattmathis
Copy link
Contributor

I don't understand the issue here. Perhaps it is already resolved?

@stephen-soltesz
Copy link
Contributor Author

It is not resolved. An example of the essential issue: gardener creates ndt.ndt7 in mlab-oti. Something else creates a view for ndt.ndt7 in measurement-lab.

@mattmathis
Copy link
Contributor

Right but both are expected to change. I would expect something like mlab-oti.ndt_raw.ndt7_x20210401 for the gardner output and *.raw_ndt.ndt7 for views in all projects. at the moment we can exploit raw_ndt vs ndt_raw to sitestep the problem.

BTW this might be a nice motif for all tables (versioned) and views (unversioned) in the same dataset. e.g. also ndt_joined

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants