diff --git a/img/.DS_Store b/img/.DS_Store
deleted file mode 100644
index f8ec0c0..0000000
Binary files a/img/.DS_Store and /dev/null differ
diff --git a/index.xml b/index.xml
index 4540027..5735b6f 100644
--- a/index.xml
+++ b/index.xml
@@ -137,8 +137,8 @@
<tr>
<td><a href="#march-15">March 15</a></td>
-<td>Matthew Davis</td>
-<td><em>TBD</em></td>
+<td>Matthew C. Davis</td>
+<td>NaNofuzz to TestLoop: A Journey from Empirical to Theoretical Research (and back again)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
@@ -263,13 +263,13 @@ a focus on security properties.</p>
<h1 id="march-15">March 15</h1>
-<p><strong>Speaker:</strong> Matthew Davis</p>
+<p><strong>Speaker:</strong> Matthew C. Davis</p>
-<p><strong>Title:</strong> <em>TBD</em></p>
+<p><strong>Title:</strong> NaNofuzz to TestLoop: A Journey from Empirical to Theoretical Research (and back again)</p>
-<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> <em>TBD</em></p>
+<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> Software testing labor cost in the United States exceeded an estimated $47 billion in 2021. For 50 years, Automatic Test sUite Generators (ATUGs) have intended to help developers generate test suites. The vast majority of ATUGs have focused on effectiveness measures such as code coverage, mutants killed, and bugs elicited. But few ATUGs have focused on the developer’s experience. In this talk we discuss NaNofuzz, an ATUG that focuses on the developer’s experience, as well as TestLoop, a theoretical model of the developer’s test suite generation process. We describe ways in which our empirical ATUG research informs and refines our theoretical research – and vice-versa.</p>
-<p><strong>Bio:</strong> <em>TBD</em></p>
+<p><strong>Bio:</strong> Matthew C. Davis is a Software Engineering PhD student at Carnegie Mellon University’s School of Computer Science and is advised by Dr. Brad A. Myers and Dr. Joshua Sunshine. Matthew’s research focuses on interventions that improve the human ability to build and test useful software and is motivated by twenty years of experience as a software engineer and as a global technology director in industry, where he observed first-hand many ways in which developers encounter barriers to efficiently and effectively using various types of common software engineering tools.</p>
<p><a href="../">Archive</a></p>
diff --git a/lsd-seminar/2024wi/index.html b/lsd-seminar/2024wi/index.html
index f467d2a..fbcc646 100644
--- a/lsd-seminar/2024wi/index.html
+++ b/lsd-seminar/2024wi/index.html
@@ -276,8 +276,8 @@ Languages, Systems, and Data Seminar (Winter 2024)
| March 15 |
-Matthew Davis |
-TBD |
+Matthew C. Davis |
+NaNofuzz to TestLoop: A Journey from Empirical to Theoretical Research (and back again) |
@@ -402,13 +402,13 @@ March 8
March 15
-Speaker: Matthew Davis
+Speaker: Matthew C. Davis
-Title: TBD
+Title: NaNofuzz to TestLoop: A Journey from Empirical to Theoretical Research (and back again)
-Abstract: TBD
+Abstract: Software testing labor cost in the United States exceeded an estimated $47 billion in 2021. For 50 years, Automatic Test sUite Generators (ATUGs) have intended to help developers generate test suites. The vast majority of ATUGs have focused on effectiveness measures such as code coverage, mutants killed, and bugs elicited. But few ATUGs have focused on the developer’s experience. In this talk we discuss NaNofuzz, an ATUG that focuses on the developer’s experience, as well as TestLoop, a theoretical model of the developer’s test suite generation process. We describe ways in which our empirical ATUG research informs and refines our theoretical research – and vice-versa.
-Bio: TBD
+Bio: Matthew C. Davis is a Software Engineering PhD student at Carnegie Mellon University’s School of Computer Science and is advised by Dr. Brad A. Myers and Dr. Joshua Sunshine. Matthew’s research focuses on interventions that improve the human ability to build and test useful software and is motivated by twenty years of experience as a software engineer and as a global technology director in industry, where he observed first-hand many ways in which developers encounter barriers to efficiently and effectively using various types of common software engineering tools.
Archive
diff --git a/themes/academic b/themes/academic
deleted file mode 160000
index 8d596ff..0000000
--- a/themes/academic
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-Subproject commit 8d596ffed2d080010c561679cf4e9b4da1554781