Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Problems in LPC845 SVD file from MCUXpresso SDK 2.6.0 #41

Open
hannobraun opened this issue Oct 11, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Problems in LPC845 SVD file from MCUXpresso SDK 2.6.0 #41

hannobraun opened this issue Oct 11, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
crate: lpc845-pac Issues with the lpc845-pac crate upstream Issue originates in an upstream project

Comments

@hannobraun
Copy link
Member

hannobraun commented Oct 11, 2019 •
edited by david-sawatzke
Loading

All of the following problems have been fixed. None of them have been reported to NXP so far.

  • 7220929: Fix reset mask of INTVAL in MRT0
  • 53b6b46: Remove duplicate interrupts
  • 23d4432: Fix reset value of SYSMEMREMAP in SYSCON
  • e90d462: Fix reset mask of TIMER in MRT0
  • 811c801: Fix reset mask of TRM in ADC
  • b7bfd8e: Fix reset value/mask of INTSTAT in USART0
  • e8cffc0: ACTIVE0 and BUSY0 are read-only
  • ba4b99f: Remove non-existing registers
  • f5a024e: Fix value name/description of CTRL in WKT
  • a0782e3: Fix access field of STAT fields in USART
@hannobraun hannobraun added crate: lpc845-pac Issues with the lpc845-pac crate upstream Issue originates in an upstream project labels Oct 11, 2019
@hannobraun
Copy link
Member Author

These issues have been reported to NXP through their issue tracker. If any new problems are discovered, please add comments instead of editing the original post.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
crate: lpc845-pac Issues with the lpc845-pac crate upstream Issue originates in an upstream project
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@hannobraun