Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Links in README.rst to "background reading" are no longer valid #94

Open
jalessio opened this issue May 12, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Links in README.rst to "background reading" are no longer valid #94

jalessio opened this issue May 12, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@jalessio
Copy link

I was reading up on this project and noticed that three links in the README.rst in the "background reading" section are no longer valid. I found archives of the pages using the Wayback Machine.

Perhaps these should be converted into another format archived into the docs folder?

For background reading see these two papers on the spatial distributed versioning Concept, Implementation, and Potential Development.

Concept
Original: http://boundlessgeo.com/whitepaper/new-approach-working-geospatial-data-part-1/
Archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20151103082742/http://boundlessgeo.com/whitepaper/new-approach-working-geospatial-data-part-1/

Implementation
Original: http://boundlessgeo.com/whitepaper/distributed-versioning-geospatial-data-part-2//
Archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20150814210252/http://boundlessgeo.com/whitepaper/distributed-versioning-geospatial-data-part-2/

Potential Development
Original: http://boundlessgeo.com/whitepaper/distributed-versioning-geospatial-data-part-3/
Archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20150906001450/http://boundlessgeo.com/whitepaper/distributed-versioning-geospatial-data-part-3/

Thanks!

@ajschumacher
Copy link

Thanks @jalessio! I'll use your wayback links! 👍

@cuttlefish
Copy link
Contributor

Those links seem to be fixed but it's probably a good idea to pull them into the docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants