Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] Use gcovr instead of lcov for codecov #216

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

aobolensk
Copy link
Member

@aobolensk aobolensk commented Jan 16, 2025

close #213

@aobolensk aobolensk requested a review from allnes January 16, 2025 22:26
@aobolensk aobolensk self-assigned this Jan 16, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci label Jan 16, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.46%. Comparing base (9eafe5d) to head (3f3467e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #216   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.46%   93.46%           
=======================================
  Files          34       34           
  Lines         811      811           
  Branches      226      226           
=======================================
  Hits          758      758           
  Misses          9        9           
  Partials       44       44           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@aobolensk aobolensk added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 17, 2025
Merged via the queue into learning-process:master with commit c0d70c5 Jan 17, 2025
21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix lcov failure
2 participants