Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plans for custom tokens #285

Open
SebastienGllmt opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Plans for custom tokens #285

SebastienGllmt opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@SebastienGllmt
Copy link

SebastienGllmt commented Jun 21, 2024

The current repo allows for querying user Mina balances, but what does the roadmap look like for the new token standard?

If supporting the token standard is hard, I would also settle for being able to have the bridge support some kind of message passing (i.e. being able to know a specific action was emitted on Mina from Ethereum)

I say this because:

  • Looking up the value of member variables in a contract (ex: lookup to the value of a MerkeMap type in a given Mina contract) is is probably expensive as it requires the bridge operator to explicitly opt into converting these Merkle maps to something Solidity-friendly similar to what is done with the Mina balance map which doesn't scale well as the number of merkle maps to converts could grow overtime as more projects demand to be bridged
  • Supporting the token standard requires a certain amount of work and doesn't scale well as more standards (ex: NFT standard) come out
  • A message passing system would just require monitoring events from a single "message passing" contract
  • A message passing system would presumably require the least amount of work to support
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant