-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rendering higher order tensors and uninitialized arrays. #307
Comments
The Pluto part is pretty much irrelevant. Pluto's automatic display of Symbolics is to use the Latex output, so it just boils down to |
though I don't know if there is any precedent on "standard" way to show 4-tensors in Latex? For undef, just using a |
Following your comments I tried to create a MWE, in the REPL.
|
Yup that seems to be it. Now I don't know what to do from there, but someone who does the latexification part can propose a representation at least. Or maybe the right solution is just a better behavior for "cannot latexify" that isn't just an error when in mime type display mode. |
The On the question of |
Hi,
I am opening this issue as suggest to me in the Julia discord topic Matrices and tensors with Symbolics.jl. It is about two problems I encountered while using
Symbolics.jl
withPluto.jl
. I rewrite everything here.Behaviour in the REPL is what I would expect (final output cut for legibility):
Behaviour in Pluto:
using Symbolics
Symbolics.variables(:H, 1:2, 0:3, 0:3, 0:3)
The Array so created works just fine, but the first time I thought there was something wrong in my definition (instead it is just the Pluto Latex rendering?)
undef
matricesAssuming
Symbolics.jl
is being used.Behaviour in the REPL is again what I would expect:
Behaviour in Pluto is the following:
Same comment as above, I thought I was misunderstanding something with Matrix initialization.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: