-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Possible BUKKIT Implementation #11
Comments
For information storage, I'd go with Provided with the language should be the special values As for accessors, I think For removing elements from the bukkit, I suggest |
Same syntax can work for associative arrays: lose the Possibly can integrate both into the same storage system (i.e. same BUKKIT can hold both indexed and associative array entries) |
After becoming a little older and wiser, these are now my thoughts:
To that end, I'm in favor of the syntax |
I think the indexing system when GRABBIN should be "FURST WUN", "SEKENT WUN", "FURD WUN", "FORF WUN" and so on up to "TENF WUN" and then from then on "11F WUN" and so on. So:
I think this negates the need for "FRUNT" and instead of "BAK" I suggest negative indexing starting with "LAAS WUN" so that we can continue with "SEKENT LAAS WUN" and so on. When inserting I suggest "BEFOR" and "AFTUR" and "IN" as in:
|
todo: accessing contents
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: