You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, I set num_points to 25 in the default config file configs/dense_reppoints/dense_reppoints_729pts_r50_fpn_1x.py , and tried your code to train the model with the modified config file. I tested the model with tools/test.py, and got 17.6 segm mAP which is much lower than the one reported in the paper(24.5). Besides, I got 38.0 box mAP which is close to the one reported(38.7).
How can I reproduce the results in the paper? Looking forward to your reply. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, I set num_points to 25 in the default config file
configs/dense_reppoints/dense_reppoints_729pts_r50_fpn_1x.py
, and tried your code to train the model with the modified config file. I tested the model withtools/test.py
, and got 17.6 segm mAP which is much lower than the one reported in the paper(24.5). Besides, I got 38.0 box mAP which is close to the one reported(38.7).How can I reproduce the results in the paper? Looking forward to your reply. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: