-
So I'm trying to format juicefs to run with TiKV using the following command:
(I've changed the IPs as don't like leaking info about servers onto internet; And it's not working:
Anyone know what I could be doing wrong? (or otherwise have any thoughts on doing this!) juicefs version 1.0.0-rc2+2022-06-24.fc6b120. TiKV has three pd's and three storage nodes - created for this so fresh, using v5.4.1 and happy according to usual checks. Certificates definitely work as tried using them with pd-ctl. Extra info: I'm not a go coder, but had a look anyway: error message appears to be generated after the return of the call to createStorage (in
Would consider not having a default value for that to be a bug, but won't create a bug report yet in case I'm misunderstanding something. That got it past that error, but I've now got Further info: As far as I can tell the values extracted (i.e. the certificates) from the bucket are ignored. In fact, if I switch the logging level to the highest I can see that the meta data address works, i.e.
but when it gets to the object storage server you get
noting that the first line is repeated many times due to retries. Not being able to see the certificates being placed in the tls bit combined with the above error saying "http" when it should say "https" makes me think that something is very wrong here. I guess my question now is: does JuiceFS support certificates when using TiKV as the object storage server? Manual tells you how to do it, yet as far as I can tell that code appears to be missing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
To finish this conversation with myself, I decided that as I had started looking at code I might as well start compiling code. It is a bug and I've submitted a bug report #2311 Was easy to fix, so included a patch with it that I've confirmed to work! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
To finish this conversation with myself, I decided that as I had started looking at code I might as well start compiling code. It is a bug and I've submitted a bug report #2311 Was easy to fix, so included a patch with it that I've confirmed to work!