You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First, this change will introduce a dependency on PRC, which is currently unprecedented. Personally, I don't think we want that.
HOWEVER, I have learned very recently that no mechanism currently exists which will trigger the atomic API PEPs. So seeing as how this is the only way to do this in existence, I think we can let it pass for now.
We need to do one of two things:
The test hook needs to install PRC in order for the tests to run
We add a unittest.skip decorator to this test with a note about how it can only run on systems with PRC available and is only being run manually at this time?
Let's make an issue for when the magical new imeta option appears :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
d-w-moore
changed the title
First, this change will introduce a dependency on PRC, which is currently unprecedented. Personally, I don't think we want that.
Dependency on PRC for tests
Apr 7, 2022
First, this change will introduce a dependency on PRC, which is currently unprecedented. Personally, I don't think we want that.
HOWEVER, I have learned very recently that no mechanism currently exists which will trigger the atomic API PEPs. So seeing as how this is the only way to do this in existence, I think we can let it pass for now.
We need to do one of two things:
unittest.skip
decorator to this test with a note about how it can only run on systems with PRC available and is only being run manually at this time?Let's make an issue for when the magical new
imeta
option appears :)Originally posted by @alanking in #95 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: